Please, tell me why you think evolution is pseudo-science. It's
supported by evidence, for starters, and is also constantly changing-evolution in its current form has almost nothing in common, mecahnics-wise, with Darwin's original theory. Sorry that I can't find more cites, BTW, but I'm short on time right now.
Now, Intelligent Design, on the other hand, is really more about finding things in nature, whether it's bacterial flagellum or the immune system, promptly proclaiming them designed, and then deciding doing hereafter other than arguing with the real scientists.
Oh, and two sides of science? Well, let's try that with something else-say, gravity. We've got one view, which suggests that as objects gain mass they also gain in gravity and this causes other objects to orbit around them. And then we have another side, which suggests that none of this is true and instead angels push the planets around the sun. Or maybe that's not even true, and instead angels push the sun around the earth. And then just replace 'angel' with 'rotater' and you've got 'intelligent rotation'.
And I admit, the banner is a little bizzare-but again, follow the links please, rather than just dismissing it outright, and you'll find something rather interesting from some respected organizations.
It's you and me against the world. We attack at dawn.
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but with a whimper. - T.S. Eliot