Auzzie titanosaurs

Got something to say that isn't fitting anywhere else? Post it here!

Auzzie titanosaurs

Postby chook151 » Thu May 03, 2007 7:34 am

hey i just heard th radio this morning and it said that ppl have dug up titanosaurs, possibly bigger than argentinosaurus, in australia!

dont beleive me? come look!!

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/SYD12924.htm
.................
Image
" If i'm not different, i'm dead ."
- Random hobo.
User avatar
chook151
Dragonfly
Dragonfly
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:52 am

Postby Legendary Elite » Thu May 03, 2007 8:06 am

Finally! Something good from my country! In your face Argentina! LOL!

I know how rare sauropods are such as Rhoetosaurus and the Hudghedon Sauropod (A Brachiosaurid found in Queensland) and a few others. I am hoping Australia not only holds the record for the most unusual and bizaare dinosaurs (except for Therizinosaurs not found in Australia) but also for the biggest dinosaurs. We only find most of the time dinosaurs which maybe sub-species of others like Polar Allosaurs. Let's hope Australia beats the world-record this year in 2007!!!

AUSSIE AUSSIE!!!!
Legendary Elite
Banned
 
Posts: 1462
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Dinonerd » Thu May 03, 2007 11:09 am

Finally! Another dinosaur to add to our collection down south!
RIP Steve

RIP Zyzz
User avatar
Dinonerd
Mosquito
Mosquito
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:34 am
Location: Australia

Postby TyrantTR » Fri May 04, 2007 1:23 am

I wonder how it could be bigger than Argentinasaurus when Austrailia is an isolated island. Wouldn't it have to be smaller? Or is Austrailia not volcanic, I forgot.
User avatar
TyrantTR
Albertosaurus
Albertosaurus
 
Posts: 1891
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: im in ur couch steelin ur change

Postby chook151 » Fri May 04, 2007 6:25 am

err, no, oh yeah, australia and antarctica where linked at that time, so australia might have had cryo! anyway, my fave mesozoic anphibian is.... the 5 mtr long koolasuchus!! WOOT! thats also in auz


PS. the bones are estimated, it means they where estimatly not fully grown, but mostly grown.
.................
Image
" If i'm not different, i'm dead ."
- Random hobo.
User avatar
chook151
Dragonfly
Dragonfly
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:52 am

Postby Legendary Elite » Wed May 09, 2007 12:00 pm

What do ya mean Tyrant? Why would that matter whether Australia had been separated? It had plenty of gigantic herbivores. This new discovery is no different. And no, Australia was not volcanic at that time and neither is it volcanic now because there is no volcanoes. Antarctica and Australia were joined to the mainland already but did slip away around the Cretacious period.
Legendary Elite
Banned
 
Posts: 1462
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Australia


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron